Xref:	news-dnh.mv.net comp.os.msdos.djgpp:748
Path:	news-dnh.mv.net!mv!news.sprintlink.net!cam.news.pipex.net!pipex!edi.news.pipex.net!pipex!sunic!sunic.sunet.se!trane.uninett.no!nac.no!news.kth.se!admin.kth.se!merope.saaf.se!electra.saaf.se!not-for-mail
From:	pausch AT electra DOT saaf DOT se (Paul Schlyter)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Replacement for inp() and outp() ?
Date:	1 Jul 1995 11:21:36 +0200
Organization:	Svensk Amat|rAstronomisk F|rening
Lines:	23
References:	<1995Jun28 DOT 135748 DOT 8772 AT city DOT ac DOT uk>
Nntp-Posting-Host:	electra.saaf.se
To:	djgpp AT sun DOT soe DOT clarkson DOT edu
Dj-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp

In article <1995Jun28 DOT 135748 DOT 8772 AT city DOT ac DOT uk>,
Mark Lewis <M DOT Lewis AT city DOT ac DOT uk> wrote:
 
> Borland and/or Miccysoft C define the I/O functions inp() and outp().  Being
> primarily a UNIX developer, and certainly not a user of Borland or Miccysoft
> C, I'm not familiar with these functions.  DJGPP defines 3 similar functions
> in libpc.a (namely inportb(), inportw(), inportl(), along with their
> respective output equivalents).  Which of these functions should be used to
> accurately duplicate the function of inp() and outp() ?
 
Try:
 
  #define  inp(port)       inportb(port)
  #define  outp(port,val)  outportb(port,val)
 
Note that Borland C also define inportb and inportw along with their
respective output equivalents.
 
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Schlyter,  Swedish Amateur Astronomer's Society (SAAF)
Nybrogatan 75 A,  S-114 40 Stockholm,  SWEDEN
e-mail:  pausch AT saaf DOT se       paul DOT schlyter AT ausys DOT se

- Raw text -