Mail Archives: djgpp/1994/04/11/17:31:58
> No, 0.9 will be the minimum required. However, if *I* take the time
> to write a DPMI host, *I* will choose to implement version 1.0.
I sort of understand why you can't do graphics very easily, if at all, with
djgpp and DPMI 0.9, and that a DPMI 1.0 host would solve this problem. But
if DJ writes a host, will it help OS/2 and Windows (and NT, Chicago...)
users? I suspect the answer is no for any case where DPMI support is part of
the operating system. There seems to be a hole here which can only be filled
by convincing the operating system vendors to upgrade their DPMI support to
1.0.
- Raw text -