X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status:	No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05 autolearn=disabled
	version=3.3.2
Date:	Mon, 07 May 2018 22:00:25 +0300
Message-Id:	<831senqoja.fsf@gnu.org>
From:	"Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT gnu DOT org) [via djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<3569b441-e678-7252-ffdd-7c45f72a5c56@iki.fi>
	(djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com)
Subject:	Re: DJGPP on NTF with SFN creating disabled [was : gcc-8.1.0 packages
	for testing]
References:	<0244cff9-6176-8aec-bbc2-6fc49602c295 AT iki DOT fi>
	<558b5ff2-71df-e556-a874-7acbb264c84a AT iki DOT fi> <5AED9B44 DOT 90000 AT gmx DOT de>
	<df616b96-646c-788b-3177-87de740f03ae AT iki DOT fi> <5AEF5D3A DOT 2030409 AT gmx DOT de> <3569b441-e678-7252-ffdd-7c45f72a5c56 AT iki DOT fi>
X-detected-operating-system:	by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From:	2001:4830:134:3::e
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Andris Pavenis (andris DOT pavenis AT iki DOT fi) [via djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
> Date: Mon, 7 May 2018 18:48:52 +0300
> 
> It seems that DJGPP mailing list has at least partial fix:
> 
> http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/mail-archives/browse.cgi?p=djgpp/2016/05/14/13:45:09
> 
> Patch was intended for exFAT which seems to not have SFN either. It works also for NTFS.

So the problem is that getShoirtFileName succeeds (although there's no
SFN), but then OpenFile using that "short name" fails, is that it?

If I understood correctly, then what kind of "SFN" do we get in those
cases?

(Also please note that old message said the patch didn't resolve all
the problems on exFAT, so presumably the same holds when SFNs are
disabled on NTFS.

Thanks.

- Raw text -