X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<5978CB81.6080608@gmx.de>
Date:	Wed, 26 Jul 2017 19:04:01 +0200
From:	"Juan Manuel Guerrero (juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de) [via djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101206 SUSE/3.1.7 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Differences between i386go32.sc from the DJGPP port and the one
	provided by the official binutils and question about the status of lto support
	for DJGPP.
References:	<xnr2zz3oyj DOT fsf AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<xnr2zz3oyj.fsf@envy.delorie.com>
X-Provags-ID:	V03:K0:uo3ysMfe5KyqbeCB2/lH8m3hxVne3ahTFnY3R/74CSxg5rdOeuX
	4320MP0bi4J85SlplXLzzvqoH1CzFQMOczCocc2j5eWczMVqogalUmNezjnrbzoaEXvSWS4
	Md/csgRBQZGhXm4QBRPMrPlloZ86ZeRY71yJLDVdot9GkFim5Q7Cvk9zf7qZaWt8oDcJcTV
	IaLKrgM9qcbRAmj7HTlfQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults:	notjunk:1;V01:K0:RcfpNtxr1BY=:6zAE0XBrZclQci2lJ2hNgU
	QBLc9RecNfk+/W77A2rozNMHSDH6rZE9IUUXN4aeE0sn2dSGvYBQ7+IA2RBLqe1UJm6OjRIXq
	QI7YrSnCsxgoMwGYWXP5uXFc8a2cNnJdCbHNPGrBbnve6GcVequCo6ewOHZ/uj01tD7BJ6Z0e
	SfiRRu5z9GMsMVHq50u+e3xZ8gS9vm/wIS2UMBej3a6FS8QUUCin62tlFNHdVwiPp7GRwdo+4
	KaAW5nlSqW3x3SpTNCZMXiyFNDQ15iCkEu/4htqu3Z5c9Ajzk71mtKC5W/Jtwq9Y1g/xUKRvN
	mqWCcCR0qB59TufXdiRfUZZjyANZK5u4dhdyPYuu+OcqRdESKCd0kqGpByOBSSpLJnc5pg7D6
	V4zgWVR3sUF4YnU1G2g9KC1m/Rk9eRJ8hAEMNWCOqmqXQD+wTyMcNc/a4B8grWIarWSG+EGU7
	Px/ZcSBJ20urkumNaXtmYLbnaajG48cuJ2w8GDcRhZln+Lgz/e8StDHx0g77+ZFGSfQtgYDTS
	FYBVrPeCHy/f/lmLPRM33ss1pC+RO6rWCoXf5YvFaBFTlRJo+KTuS0jaK7l3WGKiJsT1RTvDf
	Uk464uBpW6BWkRsYsPCkRKAtq780Xa02gGcJCDKAP9NsdazGXQGqiHZ0Mv/X5TBCowl4TOnP6
	FsA1kTbqzWWh5Cz2OVBPbCJ8z4oQbjUU8aF6J5opKMyTc88fBaZrw0b9jmjSEC8TR7Q2uONO8
	e6QBeTWbuBz87ZxEH8vjQpiwccRv08o8XaMK5A7kJDje3WLFisQU1iHUsxDTuYajiRJs5GCDO
	go4ZFJZGFOPM8cfnew3XAh0cIrgG0FY64k+FYLcGB6Nmrsi4G0=
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Am 09.05.2017 01:31, schrieb DJ Delorie:
>
> Decide what "needs" to be in there is likely Andris's thing, although
> having unused patterns usually isn't a problem.
>
> As for the binutils maintainer, that's me :-)
>
> And the i386go32.sc file is already djgpp-specific...


I would like to call your attention on this issue again bacause a new version
of binutils has been released a couple of days before and this patch has not
been commited AFAIK.  We have again a not fully functional linker script for
libc of DJGPP 2.05.  IMO the patch can be applied as it is, even if it
disables lto support.  May be we get it committed for the next release.

Regards,
Juan M. Guerrero

- Raw text -