delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2016/02/29/11:10:25

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 11:10:15 -0500
Message-Id: <201602291610.u1TGAFau002330@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: [winter-gcc AT bfw-online DOT de: DJGPP COFF relocation in absolute sections]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Could someone please see if the bug reported below affects DJGPP at
all?

From: 
To: dj AT delorie DOT com
Subject: DJGPP COFF relocation in absolute sections

Hi DJ,

since knowledge on your toolchain seems to be rare and activity on the mailing
list rather low, I would like to ask you about the COFF variant DJGPP is using.
Recently changes in binutils broke support for COFF for SCO which we are
(unfortunately) using:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19623

COFF SCO seems to dictate that symbols in absolute sections shall not be
relocated, yet the patch in binutils suggest that DJGPP/COFF might expect that.
Maybe binutils should (as initially suggested) conditionally switch behaviour
for such symbols in such sections depending on the COFF target architecture.
However I am really out of my depth on this topic and appreciate any insights.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019