X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date:	Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:44:19 +0200 (MEST)
From:	"Juan Manuel Guerrero" <juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
MIME-Version:	1.0
References:	<01c536be$Blat.v2.4$c9706680 AT zahav DOT net DOT il>
Subject:	Re: pruning current
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-Authenticated:	#27081556
Message-ID:	<26601.1112363059@www43.gmx.net>
X-Mailer:	WWW-Mail 1.6 (Global Message Exchange)
X-Flags:	0001
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> > From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT latnet DOT lv> 
> > Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 11:34:55 +0300 
> >  
> > Also: do we need v2apps/tex/old/*.  
>  
> I don't know, it depends on how well are the current binaries in 
> v2apps/tex/ tested.  The old ones got a lot of testing, and the only 
> difference is that the new ones were built with updated v2.03 libc, so 
> that they should work on Windows 2000 and XP.  If someone here uses 
> the new ports and can say that they work well, the old ones can go. 
>  
> Anyway, DJ, do these tex/old/ binaries get burned on the CD? 
 
I do not know if this is enough testing, but since does days where the 
djev203 compiled tex binaries were available I have been using them 
constantly.Specialy to create all the dvi, ps docs distributed with 
the ports. The new tex binaries worked very well for me all those years 
and I have never used the old binaries again. 
 
Regards, 
Juan M. Guerrero 

-- 
Sparen beginnt mit GMX DSL: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl

- Raw text -