X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date:	Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:59:20 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<01c4bdb7$Blat.v2.2.2$40739d00@zahav.net.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 2.2.2
In-reply-to:	<200410280927.19697.pavenis@latnet.lv> (message from Andris
	Pavenis on Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:27:19 +0300)
Subject:	Re: gcc-3.4 and option -mcpu
References:	<200410271828 DOT 56384 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv> <01c4bc52$Blat.v2.2.2$c796b760 AT zahav DOT net DOT il> <200410280927 DOT 19697 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
> Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:27:19 +0300
> 
> PS. By the way we are also doing incompatible changed for DJGPP. The latest 
> moving definition of _environ to djgpp.djl is about to generate huge amount 
> of complaints. GCC uses it's own copy with different name already for some 
> time. Adding instructions into readme file to copy djgpp.djl with different 
> name into GCC version specific directory is not going to work for those who 
> are not reading readme files.

That's true, but IIRC all of those were done out of necessity: we
didn't find better solutions.

The GCC change we are talking about, whereby -mcpu is being deprecated
in favor of another option, sounds much more gratuitous.

- Raw text -