delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2004/10/01/10:08:54

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: 2.04 [was Re: ANNOUNCE: DJGPP port of GCC-3.4.2]
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:11:21 +0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.7
Cc: ams AT ludd DOT ltu DOT se, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
References: <200409301704 DOT i8UH4nUu020036 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT ltu DOT se> <200410011034 DOT 32461 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv> <200410011308 DOT i91D8m2r015237 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <200410011308.i91D8m2r015237@envy.delorie.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <200410011711.21422.pavenis@latnet.lv>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On Friday 01 October 2004 16:08, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Also: I'm myself am not too interested in building and testing binaries
> > for DJGPP v2.03 any more, when I have got v2.04 and related tools working
>
> Can we PLEASE release 2.04 now?

It will also require to rebuild large number of packages. Otherwise mixing 
packages built using 2.03 and 2.04 is expected to cause problems. For example 
if gcc is not built using DJGPP v2.04, it will fail encountering symbolic 
links. Maybe it's even could be better to put stuff in new directories like 
v204, v204gnu, etc.

Anyway waiting will not make situation easier. So I think that 2.04 must be 
released reasonable soon.

Andris

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019