X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Date:	Thu, 13 Nov 2003 10:51:48 +0200 (EET)
From:	Esa A E Peuha <peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Sender:	peuha AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Suggested improvements
In-Reply-To:	<3FB287FC.6676B3A7@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Message-ID:	<Pine.OSF.4.58.0311131034320.21294@sirppi.helsinki.fi>
References:	<Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0311071212520 DOT 5324 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
	<3FB15D6E DOT E3FFCC07 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 58 DOT 0311121308420 DOT 11484 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
	<3FB287FC DOT 6676B3A7 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Richard Dawe wrote:

> So the macro definitions of fgetc and fputc would be compatible with C99.
> Please send a patch, if you have one.

I'm not sure that's worth it, since we must have them as functions in
libc anyway.  My intent was to avoid duplicating code, but these
functions are less than 200 bytes, so it's not significant.  Also I'd
rather not see questions about why we define fgetc to getc and is that
really allowed by ANSI.

> If you have some time, please choose something from the 2.04 status page:
>
>     http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/djgpp/2.04/status204.html
>
> If you're feeling really brave, perhaps you could integrate KB Williams's C99
> maths stuff? Or work out why memalign segfaults, when using nmalloc?

I'll take a look at nmalloc (I've been meaning to do that for some time).

-- 
Esa Peuha
student of mathematics at the University of Helsinki
http://www.helsinki.fi/~peuha/

- Raw text -