X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
From:	<ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200311051821.hA5ILvh1006781@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject:	Re: New plan for 2.04
In-Reply-To:	<28.3fb51c33.2cd9cf2d@aol.com> "from Kbwms@aol.com at Nov 4, 2003
	10:57:33 pm"
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Wed, 5 Nov 2003 19:21:57 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MailScanner:	Found to be clean
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

According to Kbwms AT aol DOT com:
> > Plus it's a moving target. It more likely to be done if there's an
> > up-to-date finished piece of software to add.
> > 
> 
> You are certainly correct there.  I delivered some source well before it was 
> ready at the request of Richard Dawe.  No doubt a serious blunder.  
> Implementing the math_errhandling macros is the final step.

I don't think this is wrong. It's good to see what you're working
on, so we don't do the same work twice. And if somebody wants to try
it out, it's great.

But it's the integration that perhaps should wait until it's
finished. Otherwise we need to integrate and then two weeks later
intergrate and then one week later integrate etc.

Actually there's no problem with what's in the paragraph above, as
long as the integrator feel up to it and have time. It's the "have
time" that is the main problem, as it's time consuming.


I'll send a private mail about the communication issue.


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -