Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2003/10/24/19:40:30
According to Richard Dawe:
> Here's what won't be in DJGPP 2.04, but could be in 2.05:
>
> * nmalloc
Could somebody refresh my memory on what is the problem with the
current CBFalconer version, please. This one I think we should try to
integrate.
(Actually I'm pretty discouraged that it hasn't been included. As I saw
it, it just slipped in. Yes, that was without regard to previous
commited improved interface with regard to malloc debugging, so I
understand that there might be problems.)
> * C99 maths functions
Can't we just add the ones that are ready? It won't be prefect but
perhaps better that nothing?
> I'm sorry. I just don't have time to try to integrate these. Thanks for the
> work done. Hopefully someone will pick up the work and try to integrate them.
> (Any volunteers?)
>
> * Full C99 compliance
> * Better POSIX compliance
Yeah, sure! Shouldn't this (request for help) go to djgpp instead of
djggp-workers? (I'm willing to make an announcement and to try to
herd/contain the volunteers for a couple of months. (I don't forsee an
huge interest.)
I'm not promising anything. But I should have some time during
Christmas. What do you want me to focus on? (Personally FAQ and
malloc() I think.)
Or I might get a compulsory coding <whatever> (something else, not
DJGPP i. e.), so no promises.
Did I mention that I won't promise anything? Even if we decide to push
some DJGPP release into 2004?
Right,
MartinS
PS. I might not even be connected between 24/12 to ~13/01. (Did I
mention that I won't promise anything?)
DS.
- Raw text -