delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2003/09/14/18:04:34

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
From: Kbwms AT aol DOT com
Message-ID: <17e.201e9e68.2c963fc2@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 18:03:46 EDT
Subject: Re: <math.h> and <libm/math.h>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 6015
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

--part1_17e.201e9e68.2c963fc2_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Rich Dawe:

In a message dated 9/14/2003 4:50:19 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk writes:

> Yep. There is certainly a lot of work to be done.
> 
> However, I think it's more important for 2.04 to be C99-compliant than
> new-POSIX-compliant. I think we should concentrate on C99-compliance right
> now. Hopefully we can do that, so that we don't have to rewrite to 
> accommodate
> new-POSIX.
> 

Okay, then new C99-compliant.  The Posix stuff doesn't look that much 
different, does it?  The requirements for math.h in C99 are heavy enough.  Actually, 
Posix and C99 are supposed to be close with C99 taking precedence, aren't 
they?


KB Williams

--part1_17e.201e9e68.2c963fc2_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><FONT  SIZE=3D3 FAMILY=3D"SERIF" FACE=3D"=
Georgia" LANG=3D"0">Rich Dawe:<BR>
<BR>
In a message dated 9/14/2003 4:50:19 PM Eastern Standard Time, rich AT phekda DOT f=
reeserve.co.uk writes:<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=3DCITE style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT=
: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px"></FONT><FONT  COLOR=3D"#000000"=
 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=3D2 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"A=
rial" LANG=3D"0">Yep. There is certainly a lot of work to be done.<BR>
<BR>
However, I think it's more important for 2.04 to be C99-compliant than<BR>
new-POSIX-compliant. I think we should concentrate on C99-compliance right<B=
R>
now. Hopefully we can do that, so that we don't have to rewrite to accommoda=
te<BR>
new-POSIX.<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
</FONT><FONT  COLOR=3D"#000000" style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=3D3=
 FAMILY=3D"SERIF" FACE=3D"Georgia" LANG=3D"0"><BR>
Okay, then new C99-compliant.&nbsp; The Posix stuff doesn't look that much d=
ifferent, does it?&nbsp; The requirements for math.h in C99 are heavy enough=
.&nbsp; Actually, Posix and C99 are supposed to be close with C99 taking pre=
cedence, aren't they?<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
KB Williams</FONT></HTML>

--part1_17e.201e9e68.2c963fc2_boundary--

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019