Date:	Mon, 25 Aug 2003 14:07:34 -0400
Message-Id:	<200308251807.h7PI7YE4019687@envy.delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<200308251747.h7PHl6XI023636@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
	(ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se)
Subject:	Re: <math.h> and <libm/math.h>
References:	<200308251747 DOT h7PHl6XI023636 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Can anyone explain what this in <math.h> is about:

The math.h that came with libm's sources came from a different source,
and at the time couldn't be used as-is because it didn't meet our
portability/standards goals.  So I did what you see.  The reasoning is
similar to the fact that many math functions are duplicated between
libc and libm.

> What should be done? Should <libm/math.h> be updated according to
> <math.h>?

If needed, yes, but note that <libm/math.h> is (well, was) mastered
elsewhere.

- Raw text -