From:	<ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200308251635.h7PGZkg2012070@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject:	Re: Arithmetic Exceptions in C99
In-Reply-To:	<148.17b6a3d9.2c77b95b@aol.com> "from Kbwms@aol.com at Aug 22, 2003
	02:22:19 pm"
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Mon, 25 Aug 2003 18:35:46 +0200 (CEST)
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MailScanner:	Found to be clean
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

According to Kbwms AT aol DOT com:
>   Do you have a copy of the real C99 or a 
> compendium of the changes?

Real C99, yes on paper. Compendium of changes, no.


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -