Date:	Mon, 18 Aug 2003 20:41:35 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi
Message-Id:	<1438-Mon18Aug2003204135+0300-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<Pine.OSF.4.51.0308181110430.25551@sirppi.helsinki.fi> (message
	from Esa A E Peuha on Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:21:04 +0300 (EET DST))
Subject:	Re: Anomaly in printf()
References:	<46 DOT 3c4de930 DOT 2c6a2e90 AT aol DOT com> <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 51 DOT 0308131046310 DOT 2694 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi> <3F3B2D8E DOT F90E84B5 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <7458-Thu14Aug2003112749+0300-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 51 DOT 0308151000100 DOT 13877 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi> <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 51 DOT 0308181110430 DOT 25551 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 11:21:04 +0300 (EET DST)
> From: Esa A E Peuha <peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi>
> 
> Actually, it doesn't; if the number is greater than 2^64, this could
> put random garbage on the string.  So we need to test the return value
> of modfl to see if we can know the digit at all.  This should really do
> it right:

Thanks!

- Raw text -