Message-ID:	<000f01c337d9$96ed9790$0100a8c0@acp42g>
From:	"Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>, "Richard Dawe" <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
References:	<200306201334 DOT h5KDYMWU012441 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <000e01c337aa$7b238800$0100a8c0 AT acp42g> <3EF41EF1 DOT 735DE31B AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Subject:	Re: LIBM patch for GCC 3.3 - math changes
Date:	Sat, 21 Jun 2003 19:43:36 +1000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> > Just in the src\libc\math directory I had to modify 26 files and the
total
> > diff came to 29K of text so instead of including it all here I have put
an
> > example of one of the files below and have included the changes for the
math
> > only changes in a zip called  LIBC_MATH_DIF.ZIP (included ieee.dif)
which is
> > available from http://clio.rice.edu/djgpp/win2k/LIBC_MATH_DIF.ZIP
> >
> > Let me know what people think about this. I will now start on a patch
for
> > the other source files that I modified for GCC 3.3.
> [snip]
>
> The patch looks good to me. I have one nit to pick: wf_remainder.dif
defines
> ux and initialises it, but it's never used.

Thanks for the feedback.

The ux  wf_remainder.dif should not be there. Looks like I cut and pasted a
little to much and included ux by mistake. Do you want me to update the
wf_remainder.dif in the zip?

Andrew

- Raw text -