Message-ID:	<3EF3E113.1C8C9C2B@yahoo.com>
Date:	Sat, 21 Jun 2003 00:37:39 -0400
From:	CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
Organization:	Ched Research
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: LIBM patch for GCC 3.3 - math changes
References:	<200306201334 DOT h5KDYMWU012441 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <000e01c337aa$7b238800$0100a8c0 AT acp42g>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Andrew Cottrell wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the feedback. So here goes the first of a second attemp
> 
> > The basic idea is a step in the right direction. However I
> > suggest you make the union public with a sensible name in
> > ieee.h. This will (hopefully) make us use one type defined
> > once and not a pletora of different ones.
> 
> Below is a patch for ieee.h
> 
... snip ...
> 
> Let me know what people think about this. I will now start on a
> patch for the other source files that I modified for GCC 3.3.

I don't know the details of this, so I may be talking nonsense,
but it reminds me of what I found in looking at the present
memalign.c.  That uses a herd of macros which do not appear in the
source, nor in malloc.h.  This makes the source unreadable,
without long and possibly fruitless searches through stdlib.h. 
So, while there may be prototypes for the source routines buried
in this manner, there should not be references IMO.

-- 
Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net)
   Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
   <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>  USE worldnet address!

- Raw text -