Message-ID:	<015801c3186c$c3978e90$0100a8c0@acp42g>
From:	"Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To:	"Andris Pavenis" <pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>,
	"Richard Dawe" <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Cc:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<3e9c6920$0$21928$afc38c87@> <3EBD0191 DOT D2AAA02C AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <008601c31761$d635c320$0100a8c0 AT acp42g> <200305112023 DOT 21414 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
Subject:	Re: gcc 3.x breaks ABI compatibility? [Was: Re: Bug 00314 -- div() still broken]
Date:	Mon, 12 May 2003 19:56:30 +1000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

..SNIP..
> > > > And then the rest of the libs.
> > > > #define DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN 1
..SNIP..
> > During the week I asked Andris if he had built a 3.2.3 test version and
he
> > had. I downloaded it and have done one build with it.
..SNIP..
> Was Your build Ok. In this case I could upload gcc-3.2.3 archives to
> ftp.delorie.com
The testing on my Celleron 800 has went okay. So far I have done three
builds and all the apps re-built without any problems.

In the announcement could you mention that this should not used with the
DJGPP 2.04 Alpha 1 release. The DJGPP 2.04 Alpha 2 release will include this
fix and an updated djdev204.zip.

Am I correct in assuming that to be safe that all of the packages in the
DJGPP 2.04 alpha 1 that install libraries will need to be re-built if this
is to be used? Please let me know if you would like any of the packages that
I have just built (with LIBC from yesterday uploaded to clio for testing
purposes).

Andrew

- Raw text -