Date:	Fri, 9 May 2003 13:03:03 -0400
Message-Id:	<200305091703.h49H33VI015329@envy.delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
In-reply-to:	<010101c31617$29c4fb60$0100a8c0@acp42g> (acottrel@ihug.com.au)
Subject:	Re: (fwd) Re: SIGILL 386 (illegal opcode)
References:	<200305071759 DOT h47HxQte028947 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> <200305072355 DOT 16047 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv> <200305072055 DOT h47KtG6q010180 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <200305080936 DOT 52719 DOT pavenis AT latnet DOT lv> <010101c31617$29c4fb60$0100a8c0 AT acp42g>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> For the next alpha release do you think we should switch to GCC 3.2.3 or
> move to 3.3 snapshots with the assumption that GCC 3.3 is realeased before
> the 2.04 is released?
> 
> I don't have the time to build both sets of packages, but I can build the
> files with GCC 3.3 and upload them to clio and then when GCC 3.3 is released
> then these could become the next alpha after gcc 3.3 is released.

If all else were equal, I'd prefer the 3.3 branch.  That would give us
some testing on gcc 3.3 also.

- Raw text -