Date:	Tue, 06 May 2003 20:13:54 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au
Message-Id:	<2593-Tue06May2003201353+0300-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar
In-reply-to:	<005e01c313c6$dda00510$0100a8c0@acp42g> (acottrel@ihug.com.au)
Subject:	Re: 2.04 alpha success, small details
References:	<3EB673E1 DOT 7000603 AT inti DOT gov DOT ar> <7458-Tue06May2003132411+0300-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <005e01c313c6$dda00510$0100a8c0 AT acp42g>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
> Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 21:58:09 +1000
> 
> > >   The binutils docs seems to be incomplete (.info files are there but
> > > .info* files aren't).
> >
> > Are we distributing binutils docs with djdev?  I didn't think so.
> No we are not distributing the bin utils docs with djdev.

Then this is not really related to the 2.04 alpha, right?

- Raw text -