Message-ID:	<002801c30983$d583db60$0100a8c0@acp42g>
From:	"Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<3EA65605 DOT D387FADA AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Subject:	Re: 2.04 status page / 2.04 alpha 1 release schedule
Date:	Wed, 23 Apr 2003 20:33:51 +1000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> Please could people check the 2.04 status page, to make sure that I
haven't
> forgotten any issues:
>
>     http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/djgpp/2.04/status204.html
I will print this and have alook while watching a movie on TV tonight.

> Current schedule for the 1st alpha release of 2.04:
>
> * Midnight GMT 23rd April 2003: Code freeze.
I will do a get now and kick of some builds to check that what's in there
now is okay. In the morning I will check for a label and do a get based on
the label.

> * Sometime 24th April 2003: dj*204 packages prepared and uploaded to DJ's
> server.

What version of GCC is to be used for the official release? (2.9.5.3 or
3.2.2)

> * Packages rebuilt with 2.04: Andrew, are you still OK with doing this? We
can
> split the work, if you'd like.
I'm still using a 56K modem and as such it's slow to upload the files. I
have packaged the batch files that I use to do the complete build and am
uploading them to clio. If you check in about 30 minutes (assuming all goes
well) there are links on the URL in the 2.04 build utils section after the
files for download.

Before releasing the dj*204.zip files could you do at least 2 re-builds of
the following, just to be safe that there are no nasties introduced in the
last few days:-
    - make 3.80
    - bash 2.05
    - file utils
    - GCC 3.2.2 (this is where bugs in the other 3 apps usually show up)

> * Sometime 28th April 2003: General release.
Sounds good.

Andrew

- Raw text -