Date:	Thu, 20 Mar 2003 06:17:43 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-Id:	<7263-Thu20Mar2003061743+0200-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<3E78D73C.3B41ECF@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Wed, 19 Mar 2003 20:46:52 +0000)
Subject:	Re: DJGPP 2.04 release? [Was: Re: nmalloc revisited]
References:	<10303182107 DOT AA24101 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <3E7868E9 DOT 19949F8E AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <9003-Wed19Mar2003174940+0200-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <3E78AA1D DOT 23720139 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3405-Wed19Mar2003223319+0200-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <3E78D73C DOT 3B41ECF AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 20:46:52 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> We could modify stat to use _invent_inode for directories, so that it
> generates the same inode every time it is called for the directory. We would
> use _invent_inode, because we cannot rely on the current method (on Win2k/XP)
> to return the same inode each time.

Are you saying that the current code does _not_ invent inodes on
Windows/XP?  I'd be surprised, I thought we invent inodes for any
kind of files on all the versions of Windows except 3.1.

> To ensure that we get the same inode, we
> would also have to ensure that we pass the same filename to _invent_inode. So
> the directory's filename would need to be fixed using _truename.

I thought `stat' already calls _truename and the result is passed to
_invent_inode, isn't that true?

- Raw text -