Date:	Wed, 19 Mar 2003 22:34:48 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-Id:	<7458-Wed19Mar2003223447+0200-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<3E78AC79.D615F93B@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:44:25 +0000)
Subject:	Re: fchdir, revision 2 [PATCH]
References:	<E18vcu4-0000a1-00 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <7458-Wed19Mar2003174724+0200-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <3E78AC79 DOT D615F93B AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 17:44:25 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> Ah, I see, you're thinking that 'filename' might contain symbolic
> links in its path, thereby requiring an lstat() instead. I don't
> think that 'filename' will contain any symbolic links. The filename
> from fd_props should have no symbolic links in it, because open()
> solves all symlinks, before storing the filename in fd_props.

The question is, what does `fstat' do on Unix for file handles opened
on symbolic links: does it return info about the link or about its
target?

- Raw text -