From:	<ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200302281831.h1SIVHT22372@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject:	elefunt results
To:	DJGPP-WORKERS <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:31:16 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MailScanner:	Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamScore:	sss
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hi.

Alas there seems to be some failures. I'm not planning to try to
understand or correct them, but I'm reporting it in case somebody else
likes to examine it.

How current are these test anyway? All capitals is a little weird;
makes me think of the 80ties.

First a tiny adjustment to the makefile (besides the PATH one):
  RUN =    # how to run the executables
changed to
  RUN = redir -eo   # how to run the executables
so I get the error messages in the files.

Should make this the default?


ttan.djl, error message missing:
TAN WILL BE CALLED WITH THE ARGUMENT     9.0072e+15
 THIS SHOULD TRIGGER AN ERROR MESSAGE


 TAN RETURNED THE VALUE     1.6063e+00

tsin.djl, error message missing:
 SIN WILL BE CALLED WITH THE ARGUMENT     9.0072e+15
 THIS SHOULD TRIGGER AN ERROR MESSAGE


 SIN RETURNED THE VALUE    -8.4893e-01

tpower.djl, error message:
 ( 2.0000000e+00) ** (-1.0740000e+03) WILL BE COMPUTED.
 THIS SHOULD NOT TRIGGER AN ERROR MESSAGE


pow(): Output of function out of range (ERANGE)
 THE VALUE RETURNED IS     4.9407e-324



Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -