Date:	Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:41:41 +0200 (EET)
From:	Esa A E Peuha <peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Sender:	peuha AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Add @tindex for types in docs [PATCH]
In-Reply-To:	<3E43C077.485354B9@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Message-ID:	<Pine.OSF.4.51.0302101423010.31820@sirppi.helsinki.fi>
References:	<E18fmrW-0000gG-00 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
	<Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 51 DOT 0302041153300 DOT 10610 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
	<3E3FDCB5 DOT D2875A7E AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 51 DOT 0302051322280 DOT 1814 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
	<2561-Wed05Feb2003174006+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3E428516 DOT 6E9BF039 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
	<Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 51 DOT 0302071259470 DOT 25428 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
	<3E43C077 DOT 485354B9 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Richard Dawe wrote:

> Esa A E Peuha wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Richard Dawe wrote:
> >
> > > Another solution to problem (a) is to get mkdoc to do the hard work. mkdoc
> > > could generate a file containing all the -I options.
> >
> > Why not simply have mkdoc do the inclusion itself?
[snip]
> It just seems like overkill to have mkdoc do all this stuff, when texinfo
> already has @include.

Overkill it may be, but I really think that mkdoc would be more
complicated if it had to output another file to pass to texinfo,
compared to the case where mkdoc puts everything it processes into a
single file.

> It sounds like you want mkdoc to become a much more
> feature-full pre-processor.

Yes, that's more or less right.  (Though I think I'll finish the
stack-checking thing first.)

> If that's the case, why don't we split mkdoc into
> two: a program to find all .txh and some m4 macros to do the pre-processing?

If that were feasible, we could just use findutils to find the files. :-)

-- 
Esa Peuha
student of mathematics at the University of Helsinki
http://www.helsinki.fi/~peuha/

- Raw text -