Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3E463619.C47BF1F3@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Sun, 09 Feb 2003 11:06:01 +0000
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Take on __solve_symlinks()
References:	<3E286C07 DOT 7040200 AT mif DOT vu DOT lt> <3E2943DA DOT 523770FC AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3E297258 DOT 50906 AT mif DOT vu DOT lt> <3E2A9396 DOT EF36FE73 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3E305DAB DOT 8090607 AT mif DOT vu DOT lt> <3E305D5A DOT 16693047 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3E386A1C DOT 9050303 AT mif DOT vu DOT lt> <3E3940F9 DOT A66C7217 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3E39880C DOT 4060607 AT mif DOT vu DOT lt> <3E398E01 DOT F62E2163 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3E450859 DOT 9090508 AT mif DOT vu DOT lt>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
[snip]
> I've created separate clean DJGPP installation with CVS libc and binaries
> from clio.rice.edu dated 2003-02-01 and symlink testsuite still does not
> fail here. Frankly, I think I've done everything I could at this point.
> Maybe it's W98 vs W2K thing? Could somebody else with W98/W2K test
> tests/libc/compat/unistd/xsymlink.c to see if it fails? In any case, I'm
> unable to debug it here, so I won't for now until someone gives a clue.

Have you tried running the small findfirst test program that I posted? I think
the difference in behaviour may be down to findfirst.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -