Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3E3FE03F.A696B8B7@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Tue, 04 Feb 2003 15:46:07 +0000
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	DJGPP workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Add @tindex for types in docs [PATCH]
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1030204092531 DOT 22830I-100000 AT is>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
[snip]
> How about reversing the word order, like this:
> 
>   @tindex stat AT r{ structure}
>   @tindex div_t AT r{ type}
> 
> (etc., you get the idea)?

Yep, that sounds good.

> I originally thought about simply "@tindex stat" etc., but that would make
> two index entries for "stat" with no easy way to understand where each one
> of them leads.  Thus the addition of "structure" and "type" (or maybe we
> should use "data type" for the latter).

I think "type" is enough.

I will submit a new patch sometime.

Thanks, bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -