Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2003/02/02/12:36:00
Richard Dawe wrote:
> Can anyone confirm that EILSEQ definitely wasn't in C89? I am
> assuming that it wasn't, because it wasn't in the header before.
According to a google cache copy I have here:
it is new in C99, introduced in C94. Whatever that means.
Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home.att.net> USE worldnet address!
- Raw text -