Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2003/02/01/23:31:06
Richard Dawe wrote:
> Charles Sandmann wrote:
... snip ...
> > There is also the unfinished business with malloc() ...
> Has anything happened with regard to its memory debugging
> interface? I.e.: is it a slot-in replacement for the current
> malloc() yet?
> Should we now consider malloc() to be 2.05 material?
If you are waiting for me to do the malloc debuggery, you should
push it down to 2.05. I don't know when I will get to that. The
hooks are there, AFAICT.
Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home.att.net> USE worldnet address!
- Raw text -