Date:	Fri, 24 Jan 2003 21:47:24 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-Id:	<3791-Fri24Jan2003214724+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<3E304571.BFA087FF@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Thu, 23 Jan 2003 19:41:37 +0000)
Subject:	Re: ssize_t: int -> signed long [PATCH]
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1030123081522 DOT 15630C AT is> <3E2FB5F0 DOT B7FD75FC AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <1659-Thu23Jan2003203612+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3E304571 DOT BFA087FF AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 19:41:37 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> > 
> > No, we don't pollute stdio.h because it already includes sys/djtypes.h
> > which defines ssize_t.
> 
> I don't think <sys/djtypes.h> does actually pollute. It #defines something
> which typedefs ssize_t.

Right, I overlooked that.

However, isn't ssize_t mandated by some standard?

> > Perhaps we should change FSEXT to return an ssize_t.
> 
> If we're going to change it, I would prefer a long long, since then it will
> cope with return values from anything (llseek, etc.). But that's not binarily
> compatible

It's also slower.

I think we should make it ssize_t.

- Raw text -