Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3E305040.9561AB5B@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jan 2003 20:27:44 +0000
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: djgpp: djgpp/src/libc/compat/string/strlcat.txh,strlcpy.txh
References:	<200301191321 DOT h0JDLhs27869 AT delorie DOT com> <9003-Sun19Jan2003193518+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3E2AEC04 DOT B89CA89D AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3E305898 DOT 5040803 AT mif DOT vu DOT lt>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
> 
> Richard Dawe wrote:
> > How about the diff below, to add some info to the developers' section of
> > the Knowledge Base?
> 
> >  @item
> > +Use @code{@@uref} to refer to a URL.  texinfo also has @code{@@url}
> > +for inserting URLs, but @code{@@uref} is more useful when texinfo
> > +is formatted into HTML.  @code{@@url} may also be deprecated soon.
>                                                                  ^^^^
> 
> Perhaps we could find a better wording here? It is always amusing to
> read 'soon', 'recently' etc. in documentation only to find out that
> these words are relative, for example, to year 1998.

OK. How about:

    @code{@@url} may be deprecated.

Or:

    By the time you read this, @code{@@url} may have been deprecated.

(Only joking. I prefer the first.)

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -