Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3E300A5D.1B191861@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jan 2003 15:29:33 +0000
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: readv, writev [PATCH]
References:	<200301231347 DOT OAA06033 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Martin Stromberg wrote:
> 
> Richard said:
> > Martin Stromberg wrote:
> > >
> > > > Say you write the first part of the data, but then the write for the
> > > > next part fails. What do you return? The call has failed, but
> > > > you have written some
> > >
> > > No. It succeeded in writing the first part. You return the value of as
> > > many bytes you've written. (Just as write would do if it partially
>                                                           ^^ "it" is write().
> > > wrote something.)
> >
> > If write partially writes something, it doesn't fail.
>                                        ^^ Is "it" writev()?

No, "it" is write.

> The above sentence doesn't make sense, unless you misunderstood me.

If write partially writes something, it doesn't fail. I.e.: if write returns
less than you asked it (a partial write), it hasn't failed.

It was a statement for emphasis.

> Or I don't understand.
> 
> > If the second write fails, how do you know how much data it has written? I

How much data does write() write, when it fails?
 
> Talking about write(): the return value if > 0. 0 otherwise.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -