Date:	Mon, 20 Jan 2003 07:53:02 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	DJGPP-WORKERS <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: _createnew
In-Reply-To:	<200301191736.SAA01943@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1030120075120.21625C-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Martin Stromberg wrote:

> On the status page there's a bug on _createnew:
> _creatnew does not honour the flags passed to it - it always opens it
> read-write mode 
> 
> Are you aware of that anamoly is actually documented in its info page.
> 
> Is it really necessary to do anything?

I think the original thought was to use the flags accepted by the LFN 
version of _creatnew.  It's a pity we don't use them if that's possible.

I do agree that this is not high priority, given the available resources.

- Raw text -