Message-ID:	<3E280A41.8060707@mif.vu.lt>
Date:	Fri, 17 Jan 2003 14:50:57 +0100
From:	Laurynas Biveinis <laurynas DOT biveinis AT mif DOT vu DOT lt>
Organization:	VU MIF
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
X-Accept-Language:	lt, en, en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: perl 5.8.0 from w2k test site problems
References:	<3E26F3A4 DOT 3000401 AT mif DOT vu DOT lt> <002901c2bdab$0ff92a40$0100a8c0 AT acp42g>
In-Reply-To:	<002901c2bdab$0ff92a40$0100a8c0@acp42g>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	17 Jan 2003 12:49:07.0259 (UTC) FILETIME=[D2B028B0:01C2BE26]
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> It appears that the Perl 5.8.0 works in most situations, but not all. In the
> next update I will put uploading the latest Perl 5.6.1 and changing the info
> on Perl 5.8.0 to be use at your own risk just in case people need it for
> some reason.
> 
> The Perl 5.6.1 available is a bit old, but works okay under 2K/XP and it
> does not have the patch that Richard included in the other email as this is
> only a recent change.
> 
> Apart from Richard's patch you could try fixing it yourself as I don't have
> the time to spend on this.

I've rebuilt 5.8.0 with Rick's patch and few other changes (replaced 
installation paths $DJDIR with /dev/env/DJDIR). Installation fails in 
man pages (they have '::' in file names). Resulting perl is no better 
than previously... I'm looking forward for 5.6.1 release.

--
Laurynas

- Raw text -