Date:	Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:10:50 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-Id:	<2427-Fri20Dec2002211050+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-reply-to:	<10212191719.AA12270@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu)
Subject:	Re: Recommended restructuring
References:	<10212191719 DOT AA12270 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:19:21 -0600 (CST)
> 
> I'm looking at what's needed to make sure libc is more modular, which
> would allow us to make it shared or allow users to replace pieces 
> more easily.  I think it's important that we make these changes ASAP.
> In particular, certain key modules (such as crt0.S) use variables 
> they don't define - and they are defined in large modules you would
> prefer to separate.

I vote for these changes.  Thanks.

- Raw text -