Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2002/09/14/17:01:42
> Do we know for sure that the SFT works on Windows XP? fstat uses the starting
> cluster number from the SFT as the inode, if available. If the SFT is bogus,
> then maybe that number would change per call? See
> src/libc/posix/sys/stat/fstat.c:651. Maybe someone could build the test
> program in fstat.c (build -DTEST) and see whether they can get reproducible
> inode numbers.
Results from Win2K (my XP box is off site and off the network):
C:\v204\djgpp\src\libc\posix\sys\stat>ftest 0 ftest.exe ./ftest.exe
handle-0: -1 268435457 20644 1 42 0 1032018006 Sat Sep 14 15:40:06 2002
Everything checks out OK
handle-1: -1 268435457 20644 1 42 0 1032018006 Sat Sep 14 15:40:06 2002
Everything checks out OK
handle-2: -1 268435457 20644 1 42 0 1032018006 Sat Sep 14 15:40:06 2002
Everything checks out OK
handle-3: -1 268435457 20644 1 42 0 1032018006 Sat Sep 14 15:40:06 2002
Everything checks out OK
handle-4: -1 268435457 20644 1 42 0 1032018006 Sat Sep 14 15:40:06 2002
Everything checks out OK
ftest.exe (5): 2 268435458 755 1 42 87552 1032017710 Sat Sep 14 15:35:10 2002
Times: 1032017710 1032017710
Block size: 65024
Failed to get starting cluster number; inode defaults to hashing
(if no other messages were printed, then this is either an empty
file on a local disk drive, or a file on a networked drive, or
you run under some kind of DOS clone)
SFT entry found, but is inconsistent with file size and time stamp
./ftest.exe (6): 2 268435459 755 1 42 87552 1032017710 Sat Sep 14 15:35:10 2002
Times: 1032017710 1032017710
Block size: 65024
Failed to get starting cluster number; inode defaults to hashing
(if no other messages were printed, then this is either an empty
file on a local disk drive, or a file on a networked drive, or
you run under some kind of DOS clone)
SFT entry found, but is inconsistent with file size and time stamp
Results under V2.03:
C:\djgpp\src\libc\posix\sys\stat>ftest 0 ftest.exe ./ftest.exe
handle-0: -1 65536 20644 1 42 0 1032018141 Sat Sep 14 15:42:21 2002
Everything checks out OK
handle-1: -1 65536 20644 1 42 0 1032018141 Sat Sep 14 15:42:21 2002
Everything checks out OK
handle-2: -1 65536 20644 1 42 0 1032018141 Sat Sep 14 15:42:21 2002
Everything checks out OK
handle-3: -1 65536 20644 1 42 0 1032018141 Sat Sep 14 15:42:21 2002
Everything checks out OK
handle-4: -1 65536 20644 1 42 0 1032018141 Sat Sep 14 15:42:21 2002
Everything checks out OK
ftest.exe (5): 2 65537 555 1 42 70656 1032018132 Sat Sep 14 15:42:12 2002
Times: 1032018132 1032018132
Failed to get starting cluster number; inode defaults to hashing
(if no other messages were printed, then this is either an empty
file on a local disk drive, or a file on a networked drive, or
you run under some kind of DOS clone)
SFT entry found, but is inconsistent with file size and time stamp
./ftest.exe (6): 2 65538 555 1 42 70656 1032018132 Sat Sep 14 15:42:12 2002
Times: 1032018132 1032018132
Failed to get starting cluster number; inode defaults to hashing
(if no other messages were printed, then this is either an empty
file on a local disk drive, or a file on a networked drive, or
you run under some kind of DOS clone)
SFT entry found, but is inconsistent with file size and time stamp
So, it seems consistently broken (ftest.exe and ./ftest.exe should be
the same ...) ... and I also see the same error messages under W98SE,
it hashes (on a 1.3Gb FAT32 drive), and on W95OSR2 on a FAT32 drive
or FAT12 floppy.
- Raw text -