X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
Message-ID:	<3CA34502.CF4D0CA2@yahoo.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Mar 2002 11:29:54 -0500
From:	CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
Organization:	Ched Research
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc.opt patch
References:	<200203281335 DOT g2SDZTB11842 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Martin Str|mberg wrote:
> 
> Now we can add/remove these options to gcc.opt and still compile libc
> with 3.0.3 or 3.0.4.
> 
> Index: djgpp/src/gcc.opt
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/src/gcc.opt,v
> retrieving revision 1.3
> diff -p -u -r1.3 gcc.opt
> --- djgpp/src/gcc.opt   2001/06/11 15:07:13     1.3
> +++ djgpp/src/gcc.opt   2002/03/28 13:13:32
> @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
>  -MD
>  -O2
> --fno-strength-reduce
>  -mcpu=pentium
>  -march=i386
>  -Wall
> @@ -13,5 +12,8 @@
>  -Wshadow
>  -Wstrict-prototypes
>  -Wwrite-strings
> +-Wundef
> +-Wcast-align
> +-Wsign-compare
>  -nostdinc
> 
> 
> Anyone oppsosed?
> 
> Then we could also add those options to gcc-l.opt and get some more
> warnings (which somebody might fix someday) but that won't stop the
> building of djlsr*.zip (as -Werror isn't there).
> 
> Should we?

This has nothing to do with your real question, but I noticed the
-mcpu-pentium above.  I use a 486, and am strongly opposed to
making any libraries (or releases) that depend on pentium
instructions.  Everything should run on any 386, except for the
obvious floating point instructions.

-- 
Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT XXXXworldnet DOT att DOT net)
   Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
   (Remove "XXXX" from reply address. yahoo works unmodified)
   mailto:uce AT ftc DOT gov  (for spambots to harvest)

- Raw text -