delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f |
From: | Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se> |
Message-Id: | <200201101620.RAA27328@father.ludd.luth.se> |
Subject: | Re: LFN32 optimizations [was: Re: Proposed lstat.c patch for Win2000/XP device bit fix |
In-Reply-To: | <10201101553.AA19444@clio.rice.edu> from Charles Sandmann at "Jan 10, 2002 09:53:14 am" |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Date: | Thu, 10 Jan 2002 17:20:51 +0100 (MET) |
X-Mailer: | ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
According to Charles Sandmann: > > Perhaps this macro should be called "_is_ff_LFN32", in case we would > > need a _is_ff_LFN macro sometime. > > There is actually no difference, the LFN32 is just part of the > signature block set in findfirs.c - it could be any string (as long > as it's consistent everywhere). Changing the name would actually be > more confusing. But it really is LFN we're talking about, isn't? Not LFN32. Is that supposed to mean LFN on a 32-bit OS? But then I suppose it get set on plain DOZE with a LFN driver too. So that's not right either. I could be wrong, though. Right, MartinS
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |