X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-workers-bounces using -f
X-Authentication-Warning:	kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f
Date:	Thu, 20 Dec 2001 12:45:07 -0600
From:	JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: RFC - Dynamic loading
Message-ID:	<20011220124507.A26821@kendall.sfbr.org>
Mail-Followup-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References:	<10112200510 DOT AA19496 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> <000001c1897f$b30362c0$c27d76d5 AT pandora DOT be>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To:	<000001c1897f$b30362c0$c27d76d5@pandora.be>; from tim.van.holder@pandora.be on Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 06:56:41PM +0100
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

What do you guys mean by these existing packages being too `heavy'?
Too much code to add to libc?  Is the standard dlopen interface
just overkill for djgpp?

[Charles W Sandmann]
-: I first looked at the two DLL type packages on Simtel.  Both of them
-: have nice features, but are a little heavy for what I am looking for.

[Tim Van Holder]
-: My local version of the now defunct DLX package added support for this,
-: which worked fine for gcc 2.95.x, but needs reworking for gcc3.  I've
-: just started looking into it again, and have gotten tentative approval
-: from NanoSoft, Inc. (who wrote DLX) to fork off my own version of the
-: library for further development.
-: I'll certainly agree that as it stands, it's a bit heavy for libc use
-: though.

- Raw text -