delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2001/11/05/12:54:49

From: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: Old files in DJGPP distribution
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 18:53:31 +0100
Message-ID: <001801c16622$c88ba240$ca3276d5@pandora.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700
In-reply-to: <200111051531.fA5FVQR03134@envy.delorie.com>
Importance: Normal
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

> And these redundancies:
> 
> acnf    212 213 250

212 can go; I'd keep 213 around, as there are major changes
in 2.5x (often requiring changes to configure.in/acincude.m4/...),
so people may want to stick with 2.13.

> amake   13 14 15

Here I think 13 and 14 can both go, as 1.5 should be fully
backward compatible (and fixes a cartload of bugs).

> bsn     128 129
Not sure.  1.28 can probably go.

> cvs     110 19
Fairly sure 1.9 can go.  This reminds me that I should really
put a package together for 1.11.1 (or whatever the latest version
is).

> em      1934 2005
19.34 can probably go.
Eli, is a 21.1 port on the cards?

> fil     316 40
Not sure, but 3.16 can probably go.

> gcc     2952 2953 302

May want to keep 2.95.3 in case there are issues with 3.0.
2.95.2 can probably go.

> gdb     418 500
4.18 can probably go.  Eli?

> gmp     311 311x
Don't know the difference.

> gpc     20b 2953
My guess is that 2.0b is seriously outdated (gcc 2.8.1?), so I think
it can go.

> gtxt    037 039 040
I'd keep 037 around, as I think it's the last 'lightweight'
gettext (i.e. without the libiconv stuff).  039 can probably go.

> gzp     124 124a
Don't know the difference.

> ind     224 225
I expect 224 can go.

> isp     3120 3206
Not sure; 3120 can probably go.

> pat     21 253
Think 2.1 can go.

> perl    552 561

May want to keep both
This reminds me, I still need to update the updated source package I
uploaded (with a 2.04-compatible Configure).  I'll do that today
(probably).

> sed     118 302 3028
1.18 can most probably go; not sure if we want/need to keep 3.0.2.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019