Date:	Tue, 5 Jun 2001 01:06:05 +0600
From:	berkus <berk AT k45 DOT ru>
X-Mailer:	The Bat! (v1.47 Halloween Edition) Personal
Organization:	XQ
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<1845860787.20010605010605@k45.ru>
To:	Eli Zaretskii <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re[2]: Fileutils 4.0 released
In-reply-To:	<9003-Mon04Jun2001213626+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References:	<CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIAEOCCDAA DOT tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
	<9003-Mon04Jun2001213626+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Use The Source, Eli Zaretskii!

Replying to your mail dated 05.06.2001 1:04,
about "Fileutils 4.0 released":

EZ> UPX has its own stub, and I'm not sure how well would it work.  What
EZ> happens when a new DJGPP version is released with a modified stub--is
EZ> UPX updated right there and then?  Does it even need to be?

UPX is alrighty to me. It causes a little overhead for running program
though, but it saves a LOT on hdd. I packed almost all my djgpp apps
with UPX, works normal.

keep in touch. berkus.
* mailto:berk AT k45 DOT ru * http://ber.k45.ru * ICQ UIN 49516372 *
* The Go! operating system development:  http://goos.sf.net *
*              "Components down to the metal"               *

- Raw text -