Date:	Fri, 04 May 2001 09:56:04 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
Message-Id:	<9003-Fri04May2001095604+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	theowl AT freemail DOT c3 DOT hu, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<10105040305.AA19355@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu)
Subject:	Re: win2000/ntvdm/djgpp (fwd)
References:	<10105040305 DOT AA19355 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
> Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 22:05:02 -0500 (CDT)
> 
> By the way, I believe the Win 2K results I sent are identical to the 
> NT 4 results

Yes, this is expected.  I'm not aware of any simple way to distinguish
between these two (which is probably intentional on MS part).

> but I don't believe some get PSP calls would break it...

Yes, that's what I'd think as well, but we will need to test it.

Thanks for testing.

- Raw text -