From:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id:	<10104300219.AA13884@clio.rice.edu>
Subject:	Re: win2000/ntvdm/djgpp (fwd)
To:	theowl AT freemail DOT c3 DOT hu
Date:	Sun, 29 Apr 2001 21:19:42 -0500 (CDT)
Cc:	eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii), djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<3AEC65FA.5812.13D9D56A@localhost> from "The Owl" at Apr 29, 2001 07:05:30 PM
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> about the issues you raised with the pm int solution, i decided to
> go ahead and patch ntvdm.exe instead, here it goes (offsets are file
> offsets):
> 
>   Comparing files ntvdm.exe.orig and ntvdm.exe
>   0004C864: AC 58
>   0004C865: E6 5E

I have applied this patch to my ntvdm.exe and it seems to work fine
on my Win2K system.  This reminds me of the bad old days when I had
to patch NT 3.1 to make DJGPP run properly :-O

Until we get a better fix, this certainly gets my seal of approval!

- Raw text -