Date:	Wed, 11 Apr 2001 12:25:54 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	"Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
Message-Id:	<6480-Wed11Apr2001122553+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIEEFACCAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
Subject:	Re: New bash 2.04 beta release
References:	<CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIEEFACCAA DOT tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 18:54:22 +0200
> 
> : looking for foo
> for dir in $PATH; do
>   if test -f $dir/foo; then
>     echo yay! foo is in $dir/foo
>     break
>   elif test -n "$ac_executable_exts"; then
>     for ext in $ac_executable_exts; do
>       if test -f $dir/foo$ext; then
>         echo yay! foo is in $dir/foo
>         break
>       fi
>     done
>   fi
> done

Then perhaps the list of executable extensions is too large.  Why do
we need anything beyond just .exe?  Do we _really_ want to find gcc.sh
or gcc.pl?

- Raw text -