From:	"Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
To:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: New language for autoconf
Date:	Tue, 10 Apr 2001 20:28:25 +0200
Message-ID:	<CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIMEFECCAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.LNX.4.10.10104101926140.28391-100000@acp3bf>
Importance:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> [...]
> > So I'd like to know what your thoughts on this are. Is
> > Perl acceptable, or would Python or Guile be preferred?
> 
> AFAIK, of the above only Perl is available as a DJGPP port. And automake
> already uses Perl, anyway, so at least it wouldn't put an _additional_ 
> burden on most maintainers. Thus, I'd think Perl is the right choice.
> 
I know Perl is the only one currently available for DJGPP, but I have
both Python and Guile sitting on my HD just waiting to be ported :-)
Python seems fairly easy, while Guile looks to be a challenge.  So my
question was as much about personal language preference than anything.

Also, is anyone working on a DJGPP package for the recently released perl
5.6.1?  If not, I'll try to find the time to apply the changes I made to
5.6.0 and get a package done.

- Raw text -