Date:	Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:10:26 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	"Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
Message-Id:	<1438-Fri19Jan2001121025+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<3A670BBB.11945.B01FB8@localhost> (snowball3@bigfoot.com)
Subject:	Re: Where does gcc -o foo make foo.exe
References:	<3A605A7C DOT 44 DOT 7AB95C AT localhost> <3A670BBB DOT 11945 DOT B01FB8 AT localhost>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
> Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:28:59 -0500
> 
> > Yes (I assume you meant /dev/env/DJDIR/bin/stubify.exe).  But I wonder 
> > whether we should add to this list SELFDIR/stubify.exe, where SELFDIR is 
> > the directory part of ld.exe's argv[0]?
> 
> As has already been noted, the stub is read in from a djgpp-specific routine 
> inside bfd where argv[0] is not accessible.

Tim suggested to look at __crt0_argv, which is a global variable.

> Making all these adjustments isn't trivial so I think for now it will be 
> better to add $DJDIR/bin/stubify.exe to the stub search list and then 
> plot an overhaul after 2.11 is released.

I agree; as long as we don't toss djgpp.djl, there's no urgency to
make these changes.

- Raw text -