Message-ID:	<002501c0796b$9b50cfc0$d90d893e@oemcomputer>
From:	"Stephen Silver" <djgpp AT argentum DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
To:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: namespace std
Date:	Mon, 8 Jan 2001 12:07:41 -0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Martin Stromberg wrote:

> Eli said:
> > On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Stephen Silver wrote:
> > 
> > > Note that the same temporary macro can (and almost certainly should) be
> > > used for each <c*> header.  (Question: What naming convention is used for
> > > DJGPP macros?  Is __dj_no_hoist_ acceptable?  Or __dj_via_cplusplus_header_?
> > 
> > I think both are acceptable, but perhaps others think otherwise.
>
> I think __dj_via_cplusplus_header_ is much better because I understand
> what it means.

OK, I'll use __dj_via_cplusplus_header_ (unless there are objections).

> What does hoist in this context mean?

See my reply to Eli.

Stephen

- Raw text -