Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3A4BAF82.4E86504F@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Thu, 28 Dec 2000 21:24:18 +0000
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.17 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: dup(), dup2() and FSEXTs
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1001224161016 DOT 10353B-100000 AT is>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> These changes are not in CVS because (IIRC) the discussion raised some
> issues which were not resolved.
> 
> dup and dup2 are special because FSEXT machinery itself uses dup, and it
> needs it to be the _real_ dup.  In addition, again IIRC, there was
> uncertainty as to what would a user want to accomplish by hooking a dup
> call.

I think the functionality of dup() can be emulated using the F_DUPFD
anyway. I'll play around with that instead.

> I believe you should be able to see all the deliberations in the mail
> archives on DJ's server.  We can discuss this again, if something is
> unclear.

Yes, I read the deliberations before I posted. I was just wondering if any
off-list progress had been made.

Thanks, bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe
[ mailto:richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com | http://www.bigfoot.com/~richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -