From:	Martin Stromberg <eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200012120801.JAA14908@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Subject:	Re: Locking fcntl changes #2
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Tue, 12 Dec 2000 09:01:01 +0100 (MET)
In-Reply-To:	<5.0.2.1.0.20001212000231.02394850@pop5.banet.net> from "Peter J. Farley III" at Dec 12, 2000 12:11:23 AM
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> 
> At 11:09 PM 12/11/00 -0500, you wrote:
>  >OK, Real Soon Now has arrived.  I think I have incorporated all of 
> the
>  >suggestions and corrections that were made.  Here are the major 
> changes
>  >since the first version:
> <Snipped>
> 
> I forgot to mention that I also fixed one "ljmp" and one "lcall" 
> warning reported in "crt0.S", in addition to similar changes made to 
> "exceptn.S" and "dbgcom.c".  These fixes are now possible due to the 
> GAS-version checking incorporated into "makefile.inc".

I'd be much happier if you seperated semantically different patches
into different submissions, such as this as warnings workarounds and
the locking code.

> In /tests I added the "makefile.def" file from /src and code to include 
> it in "/tests/makefile.inc", as well as making the same 
> GAS-version-checking code changes as I put into "/src/makefile.inc".
> 
> The "makefile.inc" files both also check for and use the correct 
> location of "libgcc.a".

This is another semantically different patch.


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -