delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Fri, 23 Jun 2000 08:16:03 +0300 (IDT) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net> |
cc: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Patch: new GCC builtins for stdarg.h/varargs.h |
In-Reply-To: | <39525DBB.905C4611@softhome.net> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000623081538.4583B-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Laurynas Biveinis wrote: > I wrote: > > > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Yes. But this is even better: > > > > > > @findex va_list AT r{, implemented with GCC built-ins} > > > > So is the following OK to install? > > Can anyone explicitly approve that patch, or is it OK because > it was here for some time and nobody has spoken up? I gather you can check it in, since no one objected to it.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |